The models covered
Ornith 1.0 — the agentic-coding specialist (DeepReinforce, MIT)
Released June 25, 2026. Built for agentic coding: it doesn't just write code, it
plans, runs tools, tests and fixes its own mistakes. Field note: on a MacBook Pro M5
Max, Ornith 1.0 35B beats Qwen3.6 at coding and agentic workflows —
the value of specialization. MIT license, unrestricted commercial use. Available as
GGUF (Ollama, LM Studio).
| Model | Q4 memory | SWE-Bench | Who it's for |
| Ornith-1.0-9B | ~6 GB | 69.4 | Entry point, modest machines |
| Ornith-1.0-31B | ~20 GB | — | Dense, stable |
| Ornith-1.0-35B MoE | ~25 GB | 75.6 | Recommended for most |
| Ornith-1.0-397B MoE | ~200 GB FP8 | 82.4 | Servers, production |
Qwen3.5 / Qwen3.6 — the multimodal generalist (Alibaba, Apache 2.0)
Excellent in French, multimodal, 262,000-token context. Where Ornith wins at code,
Qwen is unbeatable at language: summaries, document Q&A, contract analysis,
drafting. Qwen3.6 has the same memory footprint as 3.5 — a drop-in replacement.
| Model | Q4 memory | Who it's for |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-4B | ~2.4 GB | Very modest machines, simple tasks |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-9B | ~5.5 GB | A serious entry point |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-27B | ~16.5 GB | Excellent all-rounder, fits in 24 GB |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-35B-A3B MoE | ~21-22 GB | The star: 35B quality, 3B speed |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-122B-A10B MoE | ~74-81 GB | Frontier class, beats GPT-5 mini at tool use |
| Qwen3.5/3.6-397B MoE | ~242 GB | Very powerful servers |
Qwen for: documents, files, drafting, summaries. Ornith for: code, automation, agents, scripts.
Cohere Transcribe — speech to text (Apache 2.0)
#1 on Hugging Face's Open ASR Leaderboard: 5.42% error rate vs 7.44% for Whisper Large
v3. 14 languages including French, ~5 GB, runs on almost any recent hardware, ~525
minutes of audio transcribed per minute. Known limits: no speaker identification, no
native timestamps, and it's trained mostly on European French — test it on
your own Québécois recordings, especially if you mix French and English in
one sentence.
The classic safe bets
- Llama 3.3 70B (Meta): ~40-43 GB at Q4. A proven generalist with the largest ecosystem. Needs two GPUs or a big-memory Mac.
- Mistral Small 24B (Mistral): ~13-14 GB at Q4. Excellent in French, fits in 16 GB.
Mac — unified memory, the big advantage
✅ works well · 🟡 works but tight or slow · ❌ does not fit. Apple's native MLX format is ~10-15% leaner than GGUF and often 15-30% faster.
MacBook Air M4 (fanless — ideal for transcription and small models)
| Model | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Cohere Transcribe | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-9B / Ornith-1.0-9B | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-27B | ❌ | ✅ |
| Mistral Small 24B | 🟡 | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B / Ornith-1.0-35B | ❌ | 🟡 |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ❌ | ❌ |
MacBook Pro M5 Pro
| Model | 24 GB | 48 GB |
| Cohere Transcribe | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-27B | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B MoE | ✅ | ✅ |
| Ornith-1.0-35B MoE | 🟡 | ✅ |
| Llama 3.3 70B (Q4) | ❌ | 🟡 |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | ❌ | ❌ |
MacBook Pro M5 Max
| Model | 48 GB | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Cohere Transcribe | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Ornith-1.0-35B MoE | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Llama 3.3 70B (Q4) | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B (~74-81 GB) | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-397B | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
The M5 Max at 128 GB is the only laptop that can load Qwen3.5-122B-A10B — a
frontier-class model that beats GPT-5 mini by 30% at tool use.
Mac mini M4 / M4 Pro and Mac Studio
| Model | mini M4 (16-32 GB) | mini M4 Pro (24-64 GB) | Studio M4 Max (128 GB) | Studio Ultra (192-256 GB) |
| Cohere Transcribe | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-27B | 🟡 (32 GB) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Ornith-1.0-35B / Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | ❌ | ✅ (48-64 GB) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ❌ | 🟡 (64 GB) | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-397B | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ (256 GB+) |
The Mac mini M4 Pro (up to 64 GB) is an excellent, affordable little AI workstation.
Consumer Windows — VRAM decides
✅ works well · 🟡 works but tight or slow · ❌ does not fit. Reminder: the model must fit entirely in VRAM, or performance drops 10 to 30×.
| Model | RTX 4070 (12 GB) PC ~$1,500-2,000 | RTX 5060 Ti (16 GB) PC ~$1,500-2,000 | RTX 4090 (24 GB) PC ~$3,000-4,000 | RTX 5090 (32 GB) PC ~$4,500-6,000 |
| Cohere Transcribe | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-9B / Ornith-1.0-9B | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Mistral Small 24B | ❌ | 🟡 | ✅ | ✅ |
| Qwen3.5-27B | ❌ | 🟡 | ✅ (Q4) | ✅ (Q8) |
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ (Q4) | ✅ |
| Ornith-1.0-35B | ❌ | ❌ | 🟡 (very tight) | ✅ |
| Llama 3.3 70B | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | 🟡 (tight Q3) |
| Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
The 16 GB card is far more useful than the 12 GB one. The RTX 5090 (1.79 TB/s of
bandwidth — nearly 3× the M5 Max) excels up to 32B, but even 32 GB isn't enough for a
clean 70B: that's the structural limit of discrete GPUs vs Apple's unified memory.